Minneapolis Portfolio Management Group, LLC
SEC Form 13F institutional filer · CIK 0001317253
13F-HR · 26 reported holdings · 2026-03-31
Reported long-US-equity value
$0.80B
Top-10 concentration
51.5%
Minneapolis Portfolio Management Group, LLC — $797M AUM allocation strategy
Minneapolis Portfolio Management Group, LLC files SEC Form 13F and reports $797M of long US equity value across 26 reported holdings for 2026-03-31.
Its largest sector bet is Information Technology 29.6%, followed by Industrials 27.5% and Health Care 10.4%.
The top 10 holdings account for 52% of reported value — a conviction-weighted book concentrated in its best ideas. The sector and industry splits below are of the same reported value. Track quarter-over-quarter adds, trims, new positions and exits below — sourced from SEC 13F filings, public domain.
Minneapolis Portfolio Management Group, LLC — latest SEC 13F insights
Reported long-US-equity value (13F AUM)
$797M
total across 26 reported holdings · 2026-03-31 · excludes shorts, cash, non-US
Top-10 concentration
52% of value
higher = narrower conviction; lower = spread / hedging
Biggest adds (shares)
+$ORCL +52.6K sh · −$76.6K+$IBM +41.7K sh · +$4.71M+$HPE +12.7K sh · +$144K
Biggest trims (shares)
−$COHR −83.6K sh · −$5.77M−$GLW −71.8K sh · +$18.6M−$NEM −60K sh · −$3.56M
Exited to nil (held last quarter, gone now)
None this quarter
Sector allocation (share of reported value)
each slice is a share of the reported long-US-equity value — smaller sectors and the rest of the book roll into “Other holdings”
Qtr shift = share-point change vs the prior quarter's filing — first period tracked for this filer; the column fills in with the next quarterly refresh.
Industry allocation (share of reported value)
- Electronic Components14.2%—
- Aerospace & Defense9.9%—
- Pharmaceuticals7.2%—
- Household Products4.9%—
- Agricultural & Farm Machinery4.8%—
- Oil & Gas Equipment & Services4.8%—
- Construction Machinery & Heavy Transportation Equipment4.5%—
- IT Consulting & Other Services4.3%—
- Other holdings45.4%—
the finer GICS cut of the same book — same denominator — smaller industries roll into “Other holdings”
Qtr shift = share-point change vs the prior quarter's filing — first period tracked for this filer; the column fills in with the next quarterly refresh.
Top S&P 500 holdings
10 of 10 rows · sorted by Value ↓
| Ticker | Holding | Shares | Value | Δ QoQ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $GLW | Corning Incorporated | 515K | $70M | -71.8K | 8.8% |
| $COHR | Coherent Corp | 180K | $42.9M | -83.6K | 5.4% |
| $LMT | Lockheed Martin Corporation | 65.3K | $39.4M | -127 | 5.0% |
| $BA | Boeing Company | 197K | $39.3M | +818 | 4.9% |
| $CLX | Clorox Company | 374K | $38.8M | — | 4.9% |
| $DE | Deere & Company | 68.2K | $38.4M | +302 | 4.8% |
| $BKR | Baker Hughes Company | 623K | $38M | -1.9K | 4.8% |
| $CAT | Caterpillar Inc | 49.8K | $35.2M | -19.5K | 4.4% |
| $IBM | International Business Machines Corporation | 142K | $34.4M | +41.7K | 4.3% |
| $GNRC | Generac Holdlings Inc | 174K | $34M | +569 | 4.3% |
…and 16 more holdings in the full 13F filing (top positions only shown).
SEC Form 13F data sets · public domain · 45-day filing lag · >$100M AUM managers · as reported
← All 13F filers·← QuantOrb.pro
How to read Δ QoQ — the five insight categories, and the caveats
The categories. Analysts, quants and retail traders look past total portfolio value to isolate actionable signals. Five categories matter.
Conviction & concentration shifts
New positions vs complete exits — a brand-new stock signals high conviction; a full liquidation suggests a broken thesis or tax-loss harvesting. Aggressive sizing — look at share count, not dollars: a 20% share increase during a drawdown is strong dip-buying. Concentration — a narrowing top-5/10 means conviction; spreading capital across more names means hedging.
Sector & macro allocation rotations
Aggregating Δ QoQ moves across sectors shows where smart money is leaning in or sneaking out — rotating out of growth into defensives or energy, for example. The fund's total long equity exposure quarter-over-quarter is a proxy for overall institutional risk appetite.
Crowding & smart-money consensus
When several managers initiate or expand the same stock in the same quarter, that is institutional consensus. Contrarian reads: top pickers buying hard into a beaten-down name the market is selling.
Derivative & option overlays
Reported call/put changes indicate whether managers are adding downside hedges or leveraging upside exposure. Note: a long increase may be half of a market-neutral pair trade.
Who reads this
| Retail "cloners" | High-conviction ideas to replicate ~45 days after quarter-end. |
| Corporate IR | Which funds bought or dumped the stock, before the next call. |
| Quant / algo traders | Cross-sectional factor inputs: flow, momentum, ownership. |
Four caveats before you trade on it
- 45-day lag — holdings are quarter-end; positions may already be closed.
- Long-only — 13Fs miss shorts, pair trades and cash.
- No non-US / fixed income — the picture is US equities plus options.
- Corporate actions — splits and spinoffs distort raw share deltas.
Newsletter signup
Free subscription. Daily trading day morning dispatch. No spam.