Mn Services Vermogensbeheer B.V.
SEC Form 13F institutional filer · CIK 0001666940
13F-HR · 330 reported holdings · 2026-03-31
Reported long-US-equity value
$0.01B
Top-10 concentration
35.6%
Mn Services Vermogensbeheer B.V. — $14.2M AUM allocation strategy
Mn Services Vermogensbeheer B.V. files SEC Form 13F and reports $14.2M of long US equity value across 330 reported holdings for 2026-03-31.
Its largest sector bet is Information Technology 19.5%, followed by Communication Services 8.4% and Consumer Discretionary 8.0%.
The top 10 holdings account for 36% of reported value — a broadly spread portfolio. The sector and industry splits below are of the same reported value. Track quarter-over-quarter adds, trims, new positions and exits below — sourced from SEC 13F filings, public domain.
Mn Services Vermogensbeheer B.V. — latest SEC 13F insights
Reported long-US-equity value (13F AUM)
$14.2M
total across 330 reported holdings · 2026-03-31 · excludes shorts, cash, non-US
Top-10 concentration
36% of value
higher = narrower conviction; lower = spread / hedging
Biggest adds (shares)
+$WAT +14.9K sh · +$2.52K+$BAC +12.2K sh · −$9.61K+$T +5.5K sh · +$11.7K
Biggest trims (shares)
−$AMCR −693K sh · −$338−$F −25.8K sh · −$2.7K−$WBD −13.5K sh · −$1.62K
Added from nil (new positions)
None this quarter
Exited to nil (held last quarter, gone now)
$SJM ($3.89K last qtr)$BAX ($3.87K last qtr)$BF.B ($1.81K last qtr)
Sector allocation (share of reported value)
each slice is a share of the reported long-US-equity value — smaller sectors and the rest of the book roll into “Other holdings”
Qtr shift = share-point change vs the prior quarter's filing — first period tracked for this filer; the column fills in with the next quarterly refresh.
Industry allocation (share of reported value)
- Semiconductors11.1%—
- Interactive Media & Services7.3%—
- Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals5.1%—
- Broadline Retail4.2%—
- Pharmaceuticals3.6%—
- Systems Software3.3%—
- Automobile Manufacturers2.9%—
- Transaction & Payment Processing Services2.5%—
- Other holdings60.0%—
the finer GICS cut of the same book — same denominator — smaller industries roll into “Other holdings”
Qtr shift = share-point change vs the prior quarter's filing — first period tracked for this filer; the column fills in with the next quarterly refresh.
Top S&P 500 holdings
10 of 10 rows · sorted by Value ↓
| Ticker | Holding | Shares | Value | Δ QoQ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $NVDA | NVIDIA Corporation | 4.39M | $766K | -8.9K | 5.4% |
| $AAPL | Apple Inc | 2.85M | $724K | -5.5K | 5.1% |
| $AMZN | Amazon.com Inc | 2.89M | $603K | -4K | 4.2% |
| $GOOG | Alphabet Inc. Class C Capital Stock | 1.94M | $558K | -2.6K | 3.9% |
| $AVGO | Broadcom Inc | 1.73M | $534K | -1.4K | 3.8% |
| $MSFT | Microsoft Corporation | 1.29M | $477K | -1.6K | 3.4% |
| $GOOGL | Alphabet Inc | 1.65M | $473K | -1.3K | 3.3% |
| $TSLA | Tesla Inc | 1.12M | $416K | -1K | 2.9% |
| $LLY | Eli Lilly and Company | 312K | $287K | -400 | 2.0% |
| $JNJ | Johnson & Johnson | 930K | $227K | -2.9K | 1.6% |
…and 320 more holdings in the full 13F filing (top positions only shown).
SEC Form 13F data sets · public domain · 45-day filing lag · >$100M AUM managers · as reported
← All 13F filers·← QuantOrb.pro
How to read Δ QoQ — the five insight categories, and the caveats
The categories. Analysts, quants and retail traders look past total portfolio value to isolate actionable signals. Five categories matter.
Conviction & concentration shifts
New positions vs complete exits — a brand-new stock signals high conviction; a full liquidation suggests a broken thesis or tax-loss harvesting. Aggressive sizing — look at share count, not dollars: a 20% share increase during a drawdown is strong dip-buying. Concentration — a narrowing top-5/10 means conviction; spreading capital across more names means hedging.
Sector & macro allocation rotations
Aggregating Δ QoQ moves across sectors shows where smart money is leaning in or sneaking out — rotating out of growth into defensives or energy, for example. The fund's total long equity exposure quarter-over-quarter is a proxy for overall institutional risk appetite.
Crowding & smart-money consensus
When several managers initiate or expand the same stock in the same quarter, that is institutional consensus. Contrarian reads: top pickers buying hard into a beaten-down name the market is selling.
Derivative & option overlays
Reported call/put changes indicate whether managers are adding downside hedges or leveraging upside exposure. Note: a long increase may be half of a market-neutral pair trade.
Who reads this
| Retail "cloners" | High-conviction ideas to replicate ~45 days after quarter-end. |
| Corporate IR | Which funds bought or dumped the stock, before the next call. |
| Quant / algo traders | Cross-sectional factor inputs: flow, momentum, ownership. |
Four caveats before you trade on it
- 45-day lag — holdings are quarter-end; positions may already be closed.
- Long-only — 13Fs miss shorts, pair trades and cash.
- No non-US / fixed income — the picture is US equities plus options.
- Corporate actions — splits and spinoffs distort raw share deltas.
Newsletter signup
Free subscription. Daily trading day morning dispatch. No spam.