Neo Ivy Capital Management
SEC Form 13F institutional filer · CIK 0001727783
13F-HR · 126 reported holdings · 2026-03-31
Reported long-US-equity value
$0.17B
Top-10 concentration
23.1%
Neo Ivy Capital Management — $168M AUM allocation strategy
Neo Ivy Capital Management files SEC Form 13F and reports $168M of long US equity value across 126 reported holdings for 2026-03-31.
Its largest sector bet is Information Technology 17.2%, followed by Health Care 6.0% and Communication Services 4.8%.
The top 10 holdings account for 23% of reported value — a broadly spread portfolio. The sector and industry splits below are of the same reported value. Track quarter-over-quarter adds, trims, new positions and exits below — sourced from SEC 13F filings, public domain.
Neo Ivy Capital Management — latest SEC 13F insights
Reported long-US-equity value (13F AUM)
$168M
total across 126 reported holdings · 2026-03-31 · excludes shorts, cash, non-US
Top-10 concentration
23% of value
higher = narrower conviction; lower = spread / hedging
Biggest adds (shares)
+$AXP +32.9K sh · +$378K+$EXE +21.7K sh · +$2.38M+$KO +17.2K sh · +$1.44M
Exited to nil (held last quarter, gone now)
$WELL ($7.56M last qtr)$HST ($6.44M last qtr)$MPC ($5.34M last qtr)$CMG ($5.04M last qtr)$FISV ($4.67M last qtr)
Sector allocation (share of reported value)
each slice is a share of the reported long-US-equity value — smaller sectors and the rest of the book roll into “Other holdings”
Qtr shift = share-point change vs the prior quarter's filing — first period tracked for this filer; the column fills in with the next quarterly refresh.
Industry allocation (share of reported value)
- Semiconductors6.5%—
- Interactive Media & Services2.5%—
- IT Consulting & Other Services2.4%—
- Integrated Telecommunication Services2.4%—
- Specialty Chemicals2.3%—
- Multi-line Insurance2.2%—
- Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals2.2%—
- Health Care Equipment2.2%—
- Other holdings77.4%—
the finer GICS cut of the same book — same denominator — smaller industries roll into “Other holdings”
Qtr shift = share-point change vs the prior quarter's filing — first period tracked for this filer; the column fills in with the next quarterly refresh.
Top S&P 500 holdings
10 of 10 rows · sorted by Value ↓
| Ticker | Holding | Shares | Value | Δ QoQ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $NVDA | NVIDIA Corporation | 26.2K | $4.56M | -13.3K | 2.7% |
| $GOOGL | Alphabet Inc | 14.5K | $4.16M | — | 2.5% |
| $CTSH | Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation | 66.4K | $4.07M | — | 2.4% |
| $T | AT&T Inc | 71.8K | $4.01M | -166K | 2.4% |
| $ALB | Albemarle Corporation | 21K | $3.77M | — | 2.2% |
| $L | Loews Corporation | 35K | $3.74M | — | 2.2% |
| $AAPL | Apple Inc | 14.4K | $3.66M | -7.97K | 2.2% |
| $ISRG | Intuitive Surgical Inc | 7.89K | $3.64M | +2.3K | 2.2% |
| $F | Ford Motor Company | 313K | $3.61M | -267K | 2.1% |
| $KLAC | KLA Corporation | 2.42K | $3.56M | — | 2.1% |
…and 116 more holdings in the full 13F filing (top positions only shown).
SEC Form 13F data sets · public domain · 45-day filing lag · >$100M AUM managers · as reported
← All 13F filers·← QuantOrb.pro
How to read Δ QoQ — the five insight categories, and the caveats
The categories. Analysts, quants and retail traders look past total portfolio value to isolate actionable signals. Five categories matter.
Conviction & concentration shifts
New positions vs complete exits — a brand-new stock signals high conviction; a full liquidation suggests a broken thesis or tax-loss harvesting. Aggressive sizing — look at share count, not dollars: a 20% share increase during a drawdown is strong dip-buying. Concentration — a narrowing top-5/10 means conviction; spreading capital across more names means hedging.
Sector & macro allocation rotations
Aggregating Δ QoQ moves across sectors shows where smart money is leaning in or sneaking out — rotating out of growth into defensives or energy, for example. The fund's total long equity exposure quarter-over-quarter is a proxy for overall institutional risk appetite.
Crowding & smart-money consensus
When several managers initiate or expand the same stock in the same quarter, that is institutional consensus. Contrarian reads: top pickers buying hard into a beaten-down name the market is selling.
Derivative & option overlays
Reported call/put changes indicate whether managers are adding downside hedges or leveraging upside exposure. Note: a long increase may be half of a market-neutral pair trade.
Who reads this
| Retail "cloners" | High-conviction ideas to replicate ~45 days after quarter-end. |
| Corporate IR | Which funds bought or dumped the stock, before the next call. |
| Quant / algo traders | Cross-sectional factor inputs: flow, momentum, ownership. |
Four caveats before you trade on it
- 45-day lag — holdings are quarter-end; positions may already be closed.
- Long-only — 13Fs miss shorts, pair trades and cash.
- No non-US / fixed income — the picture is US equities plus options.
- Corporate actions — splits and spinoffs distort raw share deltas.
Newsletter signup
Free subscription. Daily trading day morning dispatch. No spam.