SARD WEALTH MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC
SEC Form 13F institutional filer · CIK 0002010095
13F-HR · 33 reported holdings · 2026-03-31
Reported long-US-equity value
$0.10B
Top-10 concentration
86.0%
SARD WEALTH MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC — $95.2M AUM allocation strategy
SARD WEALTH MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC files SEC Form 13F and reports $95.2M of long US equity value across 33 reported holdings for 2026-03-31.
Its largest sector bet is Financials 39.9%, followed by Information Technology 7.2% and Consumer Discretionary 2.8%.
The top 10 holdings account for 86% of reported value — a conviction-weighted book concentrated in its best ideas. The sector and industry splits below are of the same reported value. Track quarter-over-quarter adds, trims, new positions and exits below — sourced from SEC 13F filings, public domain.
SARD WEALTH MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC — latest SEC 13F insights
Reported long-US-equity value (13F AUM)
$95.2M
total across 33 reported holdings · 2026-03-31 · excludes shorts, cash, non-US
Top-10 concentration
86% of value
higher = narrower conviction; lower = spread / hedging
Biggest adds (shares)
+$AAPL +3.21K sh · +$648K+$AMZN +2.33K sh · +$361K+$SCHW +748 sh · +$1.51M
Biggest trims (shares)
−$IVV −714 sh · −$188K−$NVDA −513 sh · −$184K−$VTI −325 sh · −$915K
Exited to nil (held last quarter, gone now)
None this quarter
Sector allocation (share of reported value)
each slice is a share of the reported long-US-equity value — smaller sectors and the rest of the book roll into “Other holdings”
Qtr shift = share-point change vs the prior quarter's filing — first period tracked for this filer; the column fills in with the next quarterly refresh.
Industry allocation (share of reported value)
- Asset Management & Custody Banks24.2%—
- Investment Banking & Brokerage14.7%—
- Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals3.3%—
- Systems Software1.7%—
- Broadline Retail1.7%—
- Personal Care Products1.6%—
- Health Care Distributors1.4%—
- Interactive Media & Services1.3%—
- Other holdings50.0%—
the finer GICS cut of the same book — same denominator — smaller industries roll into “Other holdings”
Qtr shift = share-point change vs the prior quarter's filing — first period tracked for this filer; the column fills in with the next quarterly refresh.
Top S&P 500 holdings
8 of 8 rows · sorted by Value ↓
| Ticker | Holding | Shares | Value | Δ QoQ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $IVZ | Invesco Ltd | 134K | $20.7M | -45 | 21.8% |
| $SCHW | Charles Schwab Corporation | 457K | $14M | +748 | 14.7% |
| $AAPL | Apple Inc | 12.4K | $3.16M | +3.21K | 3.3% |
| $TROW | T. Rowe Price Group Inc | 64.2K | $2.29M | +126 | 2.4% |
| $MSFT | Microsoft Corporation | 4.47K | $1.65M | -47 | 1.7% |
| $AMZN | Amazon.com Inc | 7.83K | $1.63M | +2.33K | 1.7% |
| $PG | Procter & Gamble Company | 10.7K | $1.54M | +52 | 1.6% |
| $MCK | McKesson Corporation | 1.58K | $1.37M | -202 | 1.4% |
…and 25 more holdings in the full 13F filing (top positions only shown).
SEC Form 13F data sets · public domain · 45-day filing lag · >$100M AUM managers · as reported
← All 13F filers·← QuantOrb.pro
How to read Δ QoQ — the five insight categories, and the caveats
The categories. Analysts, quants and retail traders look past total portfolio value to isolate actionable signals. Five categories matter.
Conviction & concentration shifts
New positions vs complete exits — a brand-new stock signals high conviction; a full liquidation suggests a broken thesis or tax-loss harvesting. Aggressive sizing — look at share count, not dollars: a 20% share increase during a drawdown is strong dip-buying. Concentration — a narrowing top-5/10 means conviction; spreading capital across more names means hedging.
Sector & macro allocation rotations
Aggregating Δ QoQ moves across sectors shows where smart money is leaning in or sneaking out — rotating out of growth into defensives or energy, for example. The fund's total long equity exposure quarter-over-quarter is a proxy for overall institutional risk appetite.
Crowding & smart-money consensus
When several managers initiate or expand the same stock in the same quarter, that is institutional consensus. Contrarian reads: top pickers buying hard into a beaten-down name the market is selling.
Derivative & option overlays
Reported call/put changes indicate whether managers are adding downside hedges or leveraging upside exposure. Note: a long increase may be half of a market-neutral pair trade.
Who reads this
| Retail "cloners" | High-conviction ideas to replicate ~45 days after quarter-end. |
| Corporate IR | Which funds bought or dumped the stock, before the next call. |
| Quant / algo traders | Cross-sectional factor inputs: flow, momentum, ownership. |
Four caveats before you trade on it
- 45-day lag — holdings are quarter-end; positions may already be closed.
- Long-only — 13Fs miss shorts, pair trades and cash.
- No non-US / fixed income — the picture is US equities plus options.
- Corporate actions — splits and spinoffs distort raw share deltas.
Newsletter signup
Free subscription. Daily trading day morning dispatch. No spam.