Cedarwood Wealth LLC
SEC Form 13F institutional filer · CIK 0002114448
13F-HR · 43 reported holdings · 2026-03-31
Reported long-US-equity value
$0.08B
Top-10 concentration
74.5%
Cedarwood Wealth LLC — $78.9M AUM allocation strategy
Cedarwood Wealth LLC files SEC Form 13F and reports $78.9M of long US equity value across 43 reported holdings for 2026-03-31.
Its largest sector bet is Information Technology 17.6%, followed by Financials 17.1% and Communication Services 4.0%.
The top 10 holdings account for 75% of reported value — a conviction-weighted book concentrated in its best ideas. The sector and industry splits below are of the same reported value. Track quarter-over-quarter adds, trims, new positions and exits below — sourced from SEC 13F filings, public domain.
Cedarwood Wealth LLC — latest SEC 13F insights
Reported long-US-equity value (13F AUM)
$78.9M
total across 43 reported holdings · 2026-03-31 · excludes shorts, cash, non-US
Top-10 concentration
75% of value
higher = narrower conviction; lower = spread / hedging
Biggest adds (shares)
+$GS +90.3K sh · +$4.26M+$SCHW +8.95K sh · +$454K+$NVDA +3.55K sh · +$398K
Biggest trims (shares)
−$IVV −1.75K sh · −$407K−$INTC −1.07K sh · +$10.9K−$PG −244 sh · −$54K
Exited to nil (held last quarter, gone now)
None this quarter
Sector allocation (share of reported value)
each slice is a share of the reported long-US-equity value — smaller sectors and the rest of the book roll into “Other holdings”
Qtr shift = share-point change vs the prior quarter's filing — first period tracked for this filer; the column fills in with the next quarterly refresh.
Industry allocation (share of reported value)
- Investment Banking & Brokerage15.0%—
- Semiconductors8.2%—
- Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals6.8%—
- Interactive Media & Services4.0%—
- Systems Software2.5%—
- Broadline Retail2.3%—
- Diversified Banks1.0%—
- Multi-Sector Holdings1.0%—
- Other holdings59.2%—
the finer GICS cut of the same book — same denominator — smaller industries roll into “Other holdings”
Qtr shift = share-point change vs the prior quarter's filing — first period tracked for this filer; the column fills in with the next quarterly refresh.
Top S&P 500 holdings
4 of 4 rows · sorted by Value ↓
| Ticker | Holding | Shares | Value | Δ QoQ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $GS | Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 158K | $7.89M | +90.3K | 10.0% |
| $AAPL | Apple Inc | 21.3K | $5.4M | +2.28K | 6.8% |
| $SCHW | Charles Schwab Corporation | 129K | $3.95M | +8.95K | 5.0% |
| $NVDA | NVIDIA Corporation | 21.9K | $3.81M | +3.55K | 4.8% |
…and 39 more holdings in the full 13F filing (top positions only shown).
SEC Form 13F data sets · public domain · 45-day filing lag · >$100M AUM managers · as reported
← All 13F filers·← QuantOrb.pro
How to read Δ QoQ — the five insight categories, and the caveats
The categories. Analysts, quants and retail traders look past total portfolio value to isolate actionable signals. Five categories matter.
Conviction & concentration shifts
New positions vs complete exits — a brand-new stock signals high conviction; a full liquidation suggests a broken thesis or tax-loss harvesting. Aggressive sizing — look at share count, not dollars: a 20% share increase during a drawdown is strong dip-buying. Concentration — a narrowing top-5/10 means conviction; spreading capital across more names means hedging.
Sector & macro allocation rotations
Aggregating Δ QoQ moves across sectors shows where smart money is leaning in or sneaking out — rotating out of growth into defensives or energy, for example. The fund's total long equity exposure quarter-over-quarter is a proxy for overall institutional risk appetite.
Crowding & smart-money consensus
When several managers initiate or expand the same stock in the same quarter, that is institutional consensus. Contrarian reads: top pickers buying hard into a beaten-down name the market is selling.
Derivative & option overlays
Reported call/put changes indicate whether managers are adding downside hedges or leveraging upside exposure. Note: a long increase may be half of a market-neutral pair trade.
Who reads this
| Retail "cloners" | High-conviction ideas to replicate ~45 days after quarter-end. |
| Corporate IR | Which funds bought or dumped the stock, before the next call. |
| Quant / algo traders | Cross-sectional factor inputs: flow, momentum, ownership. |
Four caveats before you trade on it
- 45-day lag — holdings are quarter-end; positions may already be closed.
- Long-only — 13Fs miss shorts, pair trades and cash.
- No non-US / fixed income — the picture is US equities plus options.
- Corporate actions — splits and spinoffs distort raw share deltas.
Newsletter signup
Free subscription. Daily trading day morning dispatch. No spam.