TRAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P.
SEC Form 13F institutional filer · CIK 0001009262
13F-HR · 45 reported holdings · 2026-03-31
Reported long-US-equity value
$0.52B
Top-10 concentration
66.5%
TRAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P. — $517M AUM allocation strategy
TRAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P. files SEC Form 13F and reports $517M of long US equity value across 45 reported holdings for 2026-03-31.
Its largest sector bet is Information Technology 30.1%, followed by Communication Services 16.7% and Industrials 12.6%.
The top 10 holdings account for 66% of reported value — a conviction-weighted book concentrated in its best ideas. The sector and industry splits below are of the same reported value. Track quarter-over-quarter adds, trims, new positions and exits below — sourced from SEC 13F filings, public domain.
TRAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, L.P. — latest SEC 13F insights
Reported long-US-equity value (13F AUM)
$517M
total across 45 reported holdings · 2026-03-31 · excludes shorts, cash, non-US
Top-10 concentration
66% of value
higher = narrower conviction; lower = spread / hedging
Biggest adds (shares)
+$NFLX +89.4K sh · +$9.1M+$PGR +47.1K sh · +$8.52M+$PANW +28.2K sh · +$344K
Biggest trims (shares)
−$SCHW −130K sh · −$13.6M−$AMZN −80.5K sh · −$22.6M−$NVDA −62.4K sh · −$14.8M
Exited to nil (held last quarter, gone now)
$CRM ($19.4M last qtr)$CSGP ($15.7M last qtr)$EXPE ($13.4M last qtr)$VEEV ($10.3M last qtr)$NKE ($6.79M last qtr)
Sector allocation (share of reported value)
each slice is a share of the reported long-US-equity value — smaller sectors and the rest of the book roll into “Other holdings”
Qtr shift = share-point change vs the prior quarter's filing — first period tracked for this filer; the column fills in with the next quarterly refresh.
Industry allocation (share of reported value)
- Systems Software13.0%—
- Interactive Media & Services11.2%—
- Semiconductors8.9%—
- Application Software7.7%—
- Building Products7.3%—
- Broadline Retail7.1%—
- Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing6.7%—
- Life Sciences Tools & Services6.5%—
- Other holdings31.6%—
the finer GICS cut of the same book — same denominator — smaller industries roll into “Other holdings”
Qtr shift = share-point change vs the prior quarter's filing — first period tracked for this filer; the column fills in with the next quarterly refresh.
Top S&P 500 holdings
10 of 10 rows · sorted by Value ↓
| Ticker | Holding | Shares | Value | Δ QoQ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $NVDA | NVIDIA Corporation | 264K | $46.1M | -62.4K | 8.9% |
| $FERG | Ferguson Enterprises Inc | 163K | $38M | -5.05K | 7.4% |
| $AMZN | Amazon.com Inc | 177K | $36.9M | -80.5K | 7.1% |
| $MSFT | Microsoft Corporation | 94K | $34.8M | -26.1K | 6.7% |
| $PSX | Phillips 66 | 190K | $34.6M | — | 6.7% |
| $DHR | Danaher Corporation | 175K | $33.2M | -7.07K | 6.4% |
| $PANW | Palo Alto Networks Inc | 203K | $32.6M | +28.2K | 6.3% |
| $GOOG | Alphabet Inc. Class C Capital Stock | 109K | $31.2M | -1.39K | 6.0% |
| $NFLX | Netflix Inc | 299K | $28.7M | +89.4K | 5.6% |
| $GEV | GE Vernova Inc | 31.2K | $27.3M | -3.97K | 5.3% |
…and 35 more holdings in the full 13F filing (top positions only shown).
SEC Form 13F data sets · public domain · 45-day filing lag · >$100M AUM managers · as reported
← All 13F filers·← QuantOrb.pro
How to read Δ QoQ — the five insight categories, and the caveats
The categories. Analysts, quants and retail traders look past total portfolio value to isolate actionable signals. Five categories matter.
Conviction & concentration shifts
New positions vs complete exits — a brand-new stock signals high conviction; a full liquidation suggests a broken thesis or tax-loss harvesting. Aggressive sizing — look at share count, not dollars: a 20% share increase during a drawdown is strong dip-buying. Concentration — a narrowing top-5/10 means conviction; spreading capital across more names means hedging.
Sector & macro allocation rotations
Aggregating Δ QoQ moves across sectors shows where smart money is leaning in or sneaking out — rotating out of growth into defensives or energy, for example. The fund's total long equity exposure quarter-over-quarter is a proxy for overall institutional risk appetite.
Crowding & smart-money consensus
When several managers initiate or expand the same stock in the same quarter, that is institutional consensus. Contrarian reads: top pickers buying hard into a beaten-down name the market is selling.
Derivative & option overlays
Reported call/put changes indicate whether managers are adding downside hedges or leveraging upside exposure. Note: a long increase may be half of a market-neutral pair trade.
Who reads this
| Retail "cloners" | High-conviction ideas to replicate ~45 days after quarter-end. |
| Corporate IR | Which funds bought or dumped the stock, before the next call. |
| Quant / algo traders | Cross-sectional factor inputs: flow, momentum, ownership. |
Four caveats before you trade on it
- 45-day lag — holdings are quarter-end; positions may already be closed.
- Long-only — 13Fs miss shorts, pair trades and cash.
- No non-US / fixed income — the picture is US equities plus options.
- Corporate actions — splits and spinoffs distort raw share deltas.
Newsletter signup
Free subscription. Daily trading day morning dispatch. No spam.