Redhawk Wealth Advisors, Inc.
SEC Form 13F institutional filer · CIK 0001535811
13F-HR · 123 reported holdings · 2026-03-31
Reported long-US-equity value
$0.48B
Top-10 concentration
60.6%
Redhawk Wealth Advisors, Inc. — $480M AUM allocation strategy
Redhawk Wealth Advisors, Inc. files SEC Form 13F and reports $480M of long US equity value across 123 reported holdings for 2026-03-31.
Its largest sector bet is Financials 40.0%, followed by Information Technology 9.7% and Health Care 1.2%.
The top 10 holdings account for 61% of reported value — a conviction-weighted book concentrated in its best ideas. The sector and industry splits below are of the same reported value. Track quarter-over-quarter adds, trims, new positions and exits below — sourced from SEC 13F filings, public domain.
Redhawk Wealth Advisors, Inc. — latest SEC 13F insights
Reported long-US-equity value (13F AUM)
$480M
total across 123 reported holdings · 2026-03-31 · excludes shorts, cash, non-US
Top-10 concentration
61% of value
higher = narrower conviction; lower = spread / hedging
Biggest adds (shares)
+$IVZ +429K sh · +$31.4M+$XLE +203K sh · +$12.6M+$SCHW +196K sh · +$5.7M
Biggest trims (shares)
−$BEN −381K sh · −$13.4M−$XLK −57.1K sh · −$8.47M−$IVV −42.5K sh · −$5.6M
Exited to nil (held last quarter, gone now)
$XLC ($7.74M last qtr)$APP ($431K last qtr)$UBER ($389K last qtr)$DELL ($233K last qtr)$AXP ($219K last qtr)
Sector allocation (share of reported value)
each slice is a share of the reported long-US-equity value — smaller sectors and the rest of the book roll into “Other holdings”
Qtr shift = share-point change vs the prior quarter's filing — first period tracked for this filer; the column fills in with the next quarterly refresh.
Industry allocation (share of reported value)
- Asset Management & Custody Banks21.0%—
- Investment Banking & Brokerage19.1%—
- Semiconductors4.9%—
- Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals2.9%—
- Systems Software1.9%—
- Pharmaceuticals1.2%—
- Broadline Retail1.1%—
- Integrated Oil & Gas1.0%—
- Other holdings46.9%—
the finer GICS cut of the same book — same denominator — smaller industries roll into “Other holdings”
Qtr shift = share-point change vs the prior quarter's filing — first period tracked for this filer; the column fills in with the next quarterly refresh.
Top S&P 500 holdings
7 of 7 rows · sorted by Value ↓
| Ticker | Holding | Shares | Value | Δ QoQ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $IVZ | Invesco Ltd | 1.04M | $76.9M | +429K | 16.0% |
| $SCHW | Charles Schwab Corporation | 2.12M | $59.5M | +196K | 12.4% |
| $GS | Goldman Sachs Group Inc | 446K | $31.9M | +140K | 6.6% |
| $NVDA | NVIDIA Corporation | 108K | $18.9M | -29.4K | 3.9% |
| $AAPL | Apple Inc | 55K | $14M | -1.3K | 2.9% |
| $BEN | Franklin Templeton Inc | 286K | $13.1M | -381K | 2.7% |
| $BLK | BlackRock Inc | 215K | $10.8M | +69.8K | 2.2% |
…and 116 more holdings in the full 13F filing (top positions only shown).
SEC Form 13F data sets · public domain · 45-day filing lag · >$100M AUM managers · as reported
← All 13F filers·← QuantOrb.pro
How to read Δ QoQ — the five insight categories, and the caveats
The categories. Analysts, quants and retail traders look past total portfolio value to isolate actionable signals. Five categories matter.
Conviction & concentration shifts
New positions vs complete exits — a brand-new stock signals high conviction; a full liquidation suggests a broken thesis or tax-loss harvesting. Aggressive sizing — look at share count, not dollars: a 20% share increase during a drawdown is strong dip-buying. Concentration — a narrowing top-5/10 means conviction; spreading capital across more names means hedging.
Sector & macro allocation rotations
Aggregating Δ QoQ moves across sectors shows where smart money is leaning in or sneaking out — rotating out of growth into defensives or energy, for example. The fund's total long equity exposure quarter-over-quarter is a proxy for overall institutional risk appetite.
Crowding & smart-money consensus
When several managers initiate or expand the same stock in the same quarter, that is institutional consensus. Contrarian reads: top pickers buying hard into a beaten-down name the market is selling.
Derivative & option overlays
Reported call/put changes indicate whether managers are adding downside hedges or leveraging upside exposure. Note: a long increase may be half of a market-neutral pair trade.
Who reads this
| Retail "cloners" | High-conviction ideas to replicate ~45 days after quarter-end. |
| Corporate IR | Which funds bought or dumped the stock, before the next call. |
| Quant / algo traders | Cross-sectional factor inputs: flow, momentum, ownership. |
Four caveats before you trade on it
- 45-day lag — holdings are quarter-end; positions may already be closed.
- Long-only — 13Fs miss shorts, pair trades and cash.
- No non-US / fixed income — the picture is US equities plus options.
- Corporate actions — splits and spinoffs distort raw share deltas.
Newsletter signup
Free subscription. Daily trading day morning dispatch. No spam.