Oxbow Advisors, LLC
SEC Form 13F institutional filer · CIK 0001564770
13F-HR · 121 reported holdings · 2026-03-31
Reported long-US-equity value
$0.47B
Top-10 concentration
39.4%
Oxbow Advisors, LLC — $472M AUM allocation strategy
Oxbow Advisors, LLC files SEC Form 13F and reports $472M of long US equity value across 121 reported holdings for 2026-03-31.
Its largest sector bet is Energy 15.3%, followed by Information Technology 11.8% and Financials 10.1%.
The top 10 holdings account for 39% of reported value — a broadly spread portfolio. The sector and industry splits below are of the same reported value. Track quarter-over-quarter adds, trims, new positions and exits below — sourced from SEC 13F filings, public domain.
Oxbow Advisors, LLC — latest SEC 13F insights
Reported long-US-equity value (13F AUM)
$472M
total across 121 reported holdings · 2026-03-31 · excludes shorts, cash, non-US
Top-10 concentration
39% of value
higher = narrower conviction; lower = spread / hedging
Biggest adds (shares)
+$CTVA +44.7K sh · +$4.58M+$MNST +35.5K sh · +$2.36M+$MAS +33.7K sh · +$1.88M
Biggest trims (shares)
−$GOOGL −41.2K sh · −$15.3M−$ADP −24.9K sh · −$6.7M−$AAPL −24.2K sh · −$8.46M
Exited to nil (held last quarter, gone now)
$INTU ($12.7M last qtr)$APA ($11.1M last qtr)$BMY ($9.68M last qtr)$PRU ($6.55M last qtr)$BBY ($6.29M last qtr)
Sector allocation (share of reported value)
each slice is a share of the reported long-US-equity value — smaller sectors and the rest of the book roll into “Other holdings”
Qtr shift = share-point change vs the prior quarter's filing — first period tracked for this filer; the column fills in with the next quarterly refresh.
Industry allocation (share of reported value)
- Integrated Oil & Gas6.4%—
- Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals5.6%—
- Interactive Media & Services5.4%—
- Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing5.4%—
- Transaction & Payment Processing Services5.1%—
- Systems Software4.8%—
- Hotels, Resorts & Cruise Lines3.7%—
- Oil & Gas Exploration & Production3.6%—
- Other holdings60.1%—
the finer GICS cut of the same book — same denominator — smaller industries roll into “Other holdings”
Qtr shift = share-point change vs the prior quarter's filing — first period tracked for this filer; the column fills in with the next quarterly refresh.
Top S&P 500 holdings
10 of 10 rows · sorted by Value ↓
| Ticker | Holding | Shares | Value | Δ QoQ | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $AAPL | Apple Inc | 104K | $26.3M | -24.2K | 5.6% |
| $GOOGL | Alphabet Inc | 88.4K | $25.3M | -41.2K | 5.4% |
| $MPC | Marathon Petroleum Corporation | 436K | $25.3M | +28.8K | 5.4% |
| $MSFT | Microsoft Corporation | 61.6K | $22.8M | -16.6K | 4.8% |
| $CVX | Chevron Corporation | 81.4K | $16.8M | -5.81K | 3.6% |
| $BA | Boeing Company | 253K | $16.7M | +24.8K | 3.5% |
| $MCO | Moody's Corporation | 34.6K | $15.1M | +502 | 3.2% |
| $XOM | ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation | 77.8K | $13.2M | -43 | 2.8% |
| $MA | Mastercard Incorporated | 24.9K | $12.4M | +270 | 2.6% |
| $V | Visa Inc | 39.3K | $11.9M | +520 | 2.5% |
…and 111 more holdings in the full 13F filing (top positions only shown).
SEC Form 13F data sets · public domain · 45-day filing lag · >$100M AUM managers · as reported
← All 13F filers·← QuantOrb.pro
How to read Δ QoQ — the five insight categories, and the caveats
The categories. Analysts, quants and retail traders look past total portfolio value to isolate actionable signals. Five categories matter.
Conviction & concentration shifts
New positions vs complete exits — a brand-new stock signals high conviction; a full liquidation suggests a broken thesis or tax-loss harvesting. Aggressive sizing — look at share count, not dollars: a 20% share increase during a drawdown is strong dip-buying. Concentration — a narrowing top-5/10 means conviction; spreading capital across more names means hedging.
Sector & macro allocation rotations
Aggregating Δ QoQ moves across sectors shows where smart money is leaning in or sneaking out — rotating out of growth into defensives or energy, for example. The fund's total long equity exposure quarter-over-quarter is a proxy for overall institutional risk appetite.
Crowding & smart-money consensus
When several managers initiate or expand the same stock in the same quarter, that is institutional consensus. Contrarian reads: top pickers buying hard into a beaten-down name the market is selling.
Derivative & option overlays
Reported call/put changes indicate whether managers are adding downside hedges or leveraging upside exposure. Note: a long increase may be half of a market-neutral pair trade.
Who reads this
| Retail "cloners" | High-conviction ideas to replicate ~45 days after quarter-end. |
| Corporate IR | Which funds bought or dumped the stock, before the next call. |
| Quant / algo traders | Cross-sectional factor inputs: flow, momentum, ownership. |
Four caveats before you trade on it
- 45-day lag — holdings are quarter-end; positions may already be closed.
- Long-only — 13Fs miss shorts, pair trades and cash.
- No non-US / fixed income — the picture is US equities plus options.
- Corporate actions — splits and spinoffs distort raw share deltas.
Newsletter signup
Free subscription. Daily trading day morning dispatch. No spam.